首页> 外文OA文献 >Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle
【2h】

Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle

机译:上颌美学区中两颗相邻缺失牙的种植牙治疗:对比试验研究和原理测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim The aim of this prospective comparative pilot study was to evaluate hard and soft peri-implant tissues in patients with a missing adjacent central and lateral upper incisor treated with either one implant and an implant crown with a cantilever or two implants with solitary implant crowns up to 1 year after functional loading. Material and methods In the "Implant-cantilever group", five patients were treated with one dental implant in the region of the central incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Regular Platform). In the "Implant-implant group", five patients were treated with two adjacent dental implants: at the position of the central incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Regular Platform) and at the position of the lateral incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Narrow Platform). Implant survival, pocket probing depth, papilla index, marginal bone level and patient satisfaction were assessed during a 1-year follow-up period. Results No implants were lost during the 1-year follow-up. Mean pocket probing values of the implants were comparable between the two groups. Papilla index scores in both groups were relatively low, pointing towards a compromised papilla. Marginal bone loss was minimal and comparable between the groups. Patient satisfaction was very high in both groups. Conclusion In this 1-year prospective comparative study, no large differences in hard- and soft-tissue levels could be shown between patients with a missing central and lateral upper incisor treated with either one implant and an implant crown with a cantilever or two implants with solitary implant crowns. To cite this article:Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 207-213.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02017.x.
机译:目的这项前瞻性比较性研究的目的是评估用一个种植体和一个带有悬臂的种植体冠或两个单独种植种植体冠的种植体治疗的缺少邻近的中央和外侧上切牙的患者的硬,软种植体周围组织到功能加载后的1年。材料和方法在“植入物-悬臂组”中,五名患者接受了在中切牙区域(NobelReplace Groovy Regular Platform)中的一颗牙科植入物的治疗。在“植入物-植入物组”中,五名患者接受了两个相邻的牙齿植入物的治疗:中央切牙位置(NobelReplace Groovy常规平台)和外侧切牙位置(NobelReplace Groovy狭窄平台)。在一年的随访期内评估了植入物的存活率,口袋探测深度,乳头指数,边缘骨水平和患者满意度。结果在1年的随访中没有植入物丢失。两组的平均口袋探测值相当。两组的乳头指数得分均相对较低,表明乳头受损。两组之间的边缘性骨质流失极少且可比。两组患者的满意度都很高。结论在这项为期1年的前瞻性比较研究中,用一个种植体和一个带有悬臂的种植体冠或两个种植体和一个种植体治疗过的中上切牙缺失的患者之间,硬组织和软组织水平均无较大差异。孤立的种植体冠。引用本文:Tymstra N,Raghoebar总经理,Vissink A,Meijer HJA。上颌美学区中两颗相邻缺失牙的种植牙治疗:对比试验研究和原理测试。口语Res。 2011年22月; 207-213.doi:10.1111 / j.1600-0501.2010.02017.x。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号